Section 35 – Civil Liability for Misstatement in Prospectus
Shalini Koppula
December 19, 2023 at 06:15 AM
Section 35 civil liability for misstatement in prospectus where a person has subscribed for securities of a company acting on any statement
Misstatement in Prospectus
<insert content>
Meaning of Prospectus
<insert content>
Types of Prospectus
<insert content>
Misstatements in prospectus
<insert content>
Liabilities for Misstatements in Prospectus
<insert content>
Section 35. Civil liability for misstatements in prospectus.
- Where a person has subscribed for securities of a company acting on any statement included, or the inclusion or omission of any matter, in the prospectus which is misleading and has sustained any loss or damage as a consequence thereof, the company and every person who–
- (a) is a director of the company at the time of the issue of the prospectus;
- (b) has authorized himself to be named and is named in the prospectus as a director of the company, or has agreed to become such director, either immediately or after an interval of time;
- (c) is a promoter of the company;
- (d) has authorized the issue of the prospectus; and
- (e) is an expert referred to in sub-section (5) of section 26, shall, without prejudice to any punishment to which any person may be liable under section 36, be liable to pay compensation to every person who has sustained such loss or damage.
- No person shall be liable under sub-section (1), if he proves–
- (a) that, having consented to become a director of the company, he withdrew his consent before the issue of the prospectus, and that it was issued without his authority or consent; or
- (b) that the prospectus was issued without his knowledge or consent, and that on becoming aware of its issue, he forthwith gave a reasonable public notice that it was issued without his knowledge or consent.
- (c) that, as regards every misleading statement purported to be made by an expert or contained in what purports to be a copy of or an extract from a report or valuation of an expert, it was a correct and fair representation of the statement, or a correct copy of, or a correct and fair extract from, the report or valuation; and he had reasonable ground to believe and did up to the time of the issue of the prospectus believe, that the person making the statement was competent to make it and that the said person had given the consent required by sub-section (5) of section 26 to the issue of the prospectus and had not withdrawn that consent before 2[filing of a copy of the prospectus with the Registrar] or, to the defendant’s knowledge, before allotment thereunder.]
- Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, where it is proved that a prospectus has been issued with intent to defraud the applicants for the securities of a company or any other person or for any fraudulent purpose, every person referred to in sub-section (1) shall be personally responsible, without any limitation of liability, for all or any of the losses or damages that may have been incurred by any person who subscribed to the securities on the basis of such prospectus.
- 1. Ins. by Act 1 of 2018, s. 9 (w.e.f. 9-2-2018).
- 2. Subs. by Act 22 of 2019, s. 8, for “delivery of a copy of the prospectus for registration” (w.e.f. 15-8-2019).
Exceptions from liability for misstatements in Prospectus
<insert content>
https://blog.ipleaders.in/liable-misstatements-prospectus/
Conclusion
<insert content>
FAQ’s
- What type of liability arises under section 35 of Companies Act?
- What is Section 35 of Companies Act, 2013?
- What type of liability arises under section 35 of the Companies Act in case of a misstatements in prospectus?
- How can an auditor escape liability in case of section 35?
Comment