Qualification and Disqualification of Directors Under Companies Act, 2013

Key Takeaways

• The Companies Act, 2013, does not prescribe educational qualifications for directors. Eligibility depends on statutory compliance, a valid DIN, DSC, Form DIR-2, and Form DIR-8.
• Section 164 operates on two tracks: personal grounds under Section 164(1) and company defaults under Section 164(2).
• Disqualification under Section 164(2) applies equally to independent directors and non-executive directors. No exemption exists based on category.
• DIR-3 KYC deactivation is administrative and reversible. Section 164 disqualification carries a five-year bar and requires a formal remedy.
• Every independent director must register with the IICA Databank and pass the Online Proficiency Test within two years of registration.
• The 2023 amendment transferred Form DIR-10 applications to the Regional Director.
• A conviction-based disqualification does not take effect for 30 days. File an appeal within this window.
• The best remedy for Section 164(2) disqualification is prevention; file annual returns and financial statements on time.

Who is a Director under the Companies Act, 2013?

Section 2(34) of the Companies Act, 2013 defines a director as “a director appointed to the Board of a company.” The definition is intentionally brief. It does not describe duties or powers; it simply establishes that a director must be a natural person duly appointed to the board. No firm, body corporate, or association can serve as a director of a company.

A company is an artificial legal entity. It cannot think, decide, or act on its own. Directors are the individuals through whom a company exercises its powers, sets its strategy, and stays compliant with the law. They collectively form the Board of Directors, which is the supreme decision-making authority of the company.

The Companies Act, 2013, recognizes several categories of directors. Each category is defined by the director’s role, function, and manner of appointment. These include managing directors, whole-time directors, independent directors, nominee directors, resident directors, and alternate directors. To understand each type in detail, read our complete guide on types of directors under the Companies Act, 2013.

Section 149(1) sets the minimum and maximum board strength for every company: one director for an OPC, two for a private company, and three for a public company. The maximum limit is 15 for all company types, extendable beyond 15 by passing a special resolution. To understand board composition requirements in detail, read our complete guide on the minimum and maximum number of directors under the Companies Act, 2013.

A company can appoint more than 15 directors by passing a special resolution at a general meeting. No approval from the Central Government is required for this.

Qualification of Directors in Company Law

The Companies Act, 2013, does not prescribe educational or professional qualifications for directors. It also does not consolidate all eligibility conditions in one section. Instead, the qualifications of directors are derived from several provisions across Chapter XI of the Act, read with the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014. Every person proposed to be appointed as a director must satisfy all of the following conditions before assuming office:

Qualification	Governing Provision	What It Requires
Must be a natural person	Section 149	Only an individual can be a director. No firm, body corporate, or association is eligible
Must be of sound mind	Section 164(1)(a)	A person declared of unsound mind by a competent court cannot be appointed
Must hold a valid DIN	Section 152(3) + Section 154	Every director must obtain a Director Identification Number from the Central Government via a DIN application
Must hold a valid DSC	Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014	A Digital Signature Certificate is required to file the DIN application (Form DIR-3) on the MCA portal
Must give written consent	Section 152(5)	The director must submit consent in Form DIR-2 before assuming office. The company files it with the ROC in Form DIR-12 within 30 days
Must declare non-disqualification	Section 152(3)	The proposed director must declare in Form DIR-8 that they are not disqualified under Section 164
Must not exceed directorship limits	Section 165(1)	Cannot hold directorships in more than 20 companies simultaneously; max 10 public companies
Must satisfy residency requirement	Section 149(3)	Every company must have at least 1 director who has stayed in India for ≥ 182 days in the FY
Share qualification (if AOA requires)	Articles of Association	The Companies Act does NOT prescribe share qualification. If the AOA requires it, the director must comply within the AOA-specified time
Single DIN only	Section 155	A person cannot hold more than one DIN at any time

Important: The ₹50,000 penalty under Section 159 applies to a person holding multiple DINs. The cap of 20 directorships under Section 165 does NOT apply to Section 8 companies or dormant companies. Under Rule 14 of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014, every individual proposed to be appointed as a director must furnish their DIN, identity, and address proof before appointment.

Together, these conditions form the complete qualification framework that every proposed director must satisfy before the company files its appointment with the ROC.

Qualification of Independent Directors Under the Companies Act, 2013

An independent director is a non-executive director who has no material or pecuniary relationship with the company, its promoters, or its management. Before the Companies Act, 2013, this concept existed only in SEBI’s Listing Agreement under Clause 49. The Act codified it into statute under Section 149(6). It is now a binding legal requirement for specified classes of companies.

An independent director cannot be a managing director, a whole-time director, or a nominee director.

Which Companies Must Appoint Independent Directors?

Not all companies are required to appoint independent directors. The obligation applies to the following classes of companies:

Company Type	Requirement	Governing Provision
Listed public company	At least 1/3 of the total directors must be independent directors	Section 149(4)
Unlisted public company with paid-up share capital ≥ ₹10 crore	At least 2 independent directors	Rule 4, Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014
Unlisted public company with turnover ≥ ₹100 crore	At least 2 independent directors	Rule 4
Unlisted public company with outstanding loans, debentures, and deposits > ₹50 crore	At least 2 independent directors	Rule 4
Private companies	No mandatory obligation	Companies Act, 2013

Exemptions from Rule 4 (even if thresholds are met): Joint ventures, wholly owned subsidiaries of listed or unlisted public companies, and dormant companies are exempt from appointing independent directors.

Eligibility Criteria: Section 149(6) and Rule 5

A person qualifies as an independent director only if they satisfy all of the following conditions simultaneously:

Criteria	What It Means
Integrity and expertise	The board must be satisfied that the person is of integrity and possesses relevant expertise. Under Rule 5, skills in finance, law, management, sales, marketing, administration, research, corporate governance, or technical operations are recognised
Not a promoter	Must not be or have been a promoter of the company or its holding, subsidiary, or associate companies
Not related to promoters or directors	Must not be related to promoters or directors of the company or its group companies
No pecuniary relationship	Must not have had any pecuniary relationship with the company, its group, or their promoters/directors during the 2 immediately preceding FY or the current FY, except director remuneration
No prior employment	Must not have been an employee, proprietor, or partner of the company or its group in any of the 3 immediately preceding FYs
No auditor connection	Must not be or have been an auditor, partner, or employee of an auditing firm that audited the company in the 3 immediately preceding FY
No material NGO transaction	Must not be a CEO or director of any NGO that receives 25%+ of its receipts from the company or holds 2%+ of its total voting power
No significant shareholding	Must not hold, together with relatives, 2%+ of the total voting power of the company
Relatives not indebted	No relative must be indebted to the company or its group, or have given any guarantee/security exceeding ₹50 lakh during the 2 immediately preceding FY or current FY (Rule 5(2))

Director’s Declaration of Independence: Section 149(7)

Every independent director must give a declaration at two points: at the first board meeting after appointment, and at the first board meeting of every financial year, confirming they meet Section 149(6) criteria.

1. Tenure: Section 149(10) and (11)

An independent director holds office for up to five consecutive years. They can be reappointed for one more term of five years by passing a special resolution. After two consecutive terms, a three-year cooling-off period applies. The director cannot be appointed or associated with the company in any capacity. Tenure served before the commencement of the Companies Act, 2013, does not count toward these limits.

2. Remuneration: Section 149(9)

Independent directors are not entitled to stock options. They may receive sitting fees up to Rs. 1 lakh per meeting under Section 197(5), reimbursement of expenses, and profit-related commission approved by shareholders. The sitting fee paid to them must not be less than the fee paid to other directors. If the company has no profits or inadequate profits, remuneration may be paid in accordance with Schedule V.

3. Liability: Section 149(12)

Independent directors are liable only for acts that occurred with their knowledge, through board processes, and with their consent or connivance, or where they failed to act diligently. Passive attendance at meetings without questioning or recording dissent does not attract this protection.

4. IICA Databank and Online Proficiency Test: Section 150 read with Rule 6

Every independent director must register with the Independent Directors Databank maintained by IICA and pass an Online Proficiency Self-Assessment Test within two years of registration. If a person fails to comply, the authority removes their name from the databank. The law exempts a person who has served for at least three years as a director or Key Managerial Personnel (KMP). This exemption applies when the company is a listed company or an unlisted public company with a paid-up share capital of ₹10 crore or more.

5. Schedule IV: Code for Independent Directors

Section 149(8) requires every independent director to comply with Schedule IV, covering professional conduct, role, duties, and appointment. Independent directors must also hold at least one separate meeting every financial year without non-independent directors or management present. They are not subject to retirement by rotation under Section 152(6) and (7).

Example: Nitin Paranjpe Appointed as Independent Director at Infosys Ltd (2024)

In October 2023, Infosys Ltd (NSE/BSE: INFY) announced the appointment of Nitin Paranjpe (DIN: 00045204) as an Independent Director. The appointment was effective January 1, 2024, for a term of five years, subject to shareholder approval.

The Nomination and Remuneration Committee (NRC) first recommended his appointment to the board. At the time, Paranjpe was serving as Non-Executive Chairman of Hindustan Unilever Limited. He was not a managing director, whole-time director, or nominee director of Infosys. Additionally, he had no pecuniary relationship with the company and was not related to any promoter or director of the company. The board satisfied itself that he met all criteria under Section 149(6) before placing his appointment before shareholders for approval.

Disqualification of Directors Under the Companies Act, 2013

Certain legal grounds disqualify a person from appointment or continuation as a director. However, disqualification does not automatically remove the person from office. Instead, it prevents the person from accepting an appointment or reappointment as a director during the disqualification period.

Section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013, governs the disqualification of directors. It operates on two distinct tracks: personal grounds under Section 164(1), and company-level defaults under Section 164(2).

Section 164(1): Disqualification on Personal Grounds

A person is not eligible for appointment as a director if any of the following personal conditions apply:

Ground	Details
Unsound mind	Declared of unsound mind by a competent court, and the declaration has not been revoked
Undischarged insolvent	Declared bankrupt and not yet discharged
Pending insolvency application	Has applied to be adjudicated as an insolvent, and the application is still pending
Criminal conviction, 6 months or more	Convicted of any offence and sentenced to imprisonment for not less than 6 months. Disqualification lasts 5 years from the date of expiry of the sentence
Criminal conviction, 7 years or more	Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for 7 years or more. The person is permanently ineligible to be appointed as a director in any company
Court or Tribunal order	A court or Tribunal has passed a disqualification order that is currently in force
Non-payment of calls on shares	Has not paid calls on shares held in the company, whether alone or jointly, and 6 months have elapsed from the last day fixed for payment
Conviction under Section 188	Convicted of an offence dealing with related party transactions at any time during the last 5 years
Non-compliance with DIN requirement	Has not obtained a Director Identification Number as required under Section 152(3)
Exceeding the directorship limit	Holds directorships beyond the permitted limit of 20 companies under Section 165(1)

Section 164(2): Disqualification Due to Company Defaults

A person also faces disqualification if any company in which they serve as a director commits either of the following defaults:

Default	Details
Non-filing of financial statements or annual returns	The company fails to file financial statements or annual returns for any continuous period of 3 financial years
Failure to repay deposits, interest, debentures, or dividends	The company fails to repay deposits, pay interest on deposits, redeem debentures on the due date, pay interest on debentures, or pay any declared dividend, and such failure continues for 1 year or more

Under Section 164(2), all directors who served on the board during the period of default are disqualified. This applies regardless of their individual role in or awareness of the non-compliance. Independent directors and non-executive directors are not exempt. The company must file Form DIR-9 with the ROC within 30 days of the failure that triggers disqualification.

Newly appointed director protection: A person appointed as director of a company already in default under Section 164(2) does not incur disqualification for a period of 6 months from the date of their appointment. Founders must check the company’s compliance status carefully before accepting any new directorship — see private limited company compliance for current filing status checks.

Consequences of Disqualification

A director who becomes disqualified under Section 164 faces the following consequences:

Consequence	Details
Vacation of office	The director must vacate office in all other companies under Section 167(1)(a) — but continues in the defaulting company itself to allow rectification. This is a critical and often-misunderstood nuance
DIN deactivation	MCA/ROC deactivates the director’s DIN immediately upon Section 164 disqualification. This is separate from DIR-3 KYC deactivation under Rule 12A, which is administrative and restored upon filing the KYC with the prescribed fee. Section 164 deactivation requires a formal remedy
5-year bar	Cannot be appointed or reappointed as a director in any company for 5 years from the date of disqualification
Penalty for continuing in office	If a director continues to hold office in another company after becoming disqualified, imprisonment up to 1 year OR fine ₹1 lakh – ₹5 lakh, or both
Acts performed by a disqualified director	Validity depends on the facts of the case and applicable legal principles, including the doctrine of de facto directors — past acts are not automatically void, but post-disqualification acts may be questioned
Inability to file ROC forms	Disqualified directors cannot file any e-form on the MCA portal — affecting all signature-based filings (board resolutions, AOC-4, MGT-7, ADT-1)
Loss of statutory positions	Cannot be a Managing Director, Whole-time Director, KMP, or hold any board-appointed position

Example: MCA Disqualifies 3.09 Lakh Directors (September 2017)

In September 2017, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs published three lists containing 3,09,614 names. Authorities automatically deactivated each director’s DIN under Section 164(2) without giving prior notice or a hearing.

These directors served on boards of companies that had failed to file financial statements or annual returns for three consecutive financial years: 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16. Their DINs were deactivated by the ROC. They became ineligible to hold any directorship in India for five years.

Many of these directors also served on the boards of fully compliant companies. Section 164(2) applied to all of them equally. Several approached the High Courts across India. The Delhi High Court in Mukut Pathak v. Union of India (2019) held that Section 164(2) cannot apply retrospectively to defaults predating April 1, 2014.

The MCA introduced the Condonation of Delay Scheme (CODS-2018), giving companies a window until 30 April 2018 to file overdue returns. The Companies Fresh Start Scheme (CFSS-2020) subsequently provided a broader compliance window, allowing companies to clear all pending filings without additional fees or prosecution between 1 April 2020 and 31 December 2020.

Several writ petitions challenged the mass disqualification. The Delhi High Court in Mukut Pathak v. Union of India [2019 SCC OnLine Del 11595] held that Section 164(2) cannot apply retrospectively to defaults predating 1 April 2014 (the date the section came into force). The Madras High Court in Bhagavan Das Dhananjaya v. Union of India [2018 SCC OnLine Mad 10185] went further and held that DIN deactivation without notice violated principles of natural justice under Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution. The Karnataka High Court issued similar relief. The Bombay High Court, however, has generally been more reluctant to grant de-flagging of DINs.

This 2017 action remains the largest director disqualification event in Indian corporate history and reshaped how courts and the MCA approach Section 164(2) enforcement.

Remedies for Disqualification of Directors Under the Companies Act, 2013 

The Companies Act, 2013, does not prescribe a single remedy for the removal of disqualification under Section 164. The available options depend on the grounds of disqualification and the director’s specific circumstances.

1. Rectify the Company Default

This applies to disqualification under Section 164(2). The company must file all overdue financial statements and annual returns, or repay outstanding deposits and debentures. Once the default is remedied, the director can apply for reactivation of their DIN and regularization of their directorship.

2. Apply to NCLT under Section 252

A director, member, creditor, or worker of the company can apply to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for revival of a struck-off company under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013. The application must be filed:

• Within 20 years from the date of publication of the strike-off notice (Section 252(1) — for appeals by aggrieved persons)
• Within 3 years of strike-off (Section 252(3) — for applications by the company itself)

After the NCLT orders revival, the director can apply for DIN reactivation. The NCLT may also grant an interim stay on the disqualification while it hears the petition, though such interim relief is discretionary and depends on the bona fides of the petitioner. The Tribunal typically requires payment of all pending fees, penalties, and filings as a condition of revival.

3. File a Writ Petition: Article 226

A disqualified director can file a writ petition before the relevant High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Common grounds include violation of natural justice, deactivation of DIN without prior notice or hearing, retrospective application of Section 164(2), and no involvement in the company’s default. High Courts of Delhi, Gujarat, Karnataka, Madras, and Allahabad have directed ROCs to de-flag DINs in appropriate cases. The Bombay High Court has generally been reluctant to do so.

4. Wait for 5 Years and File Form DIR-10

After the five-year disqualification period elapses, the director can apply for removal of disqualification by filing Form DIR-10 before the Regional Director under Rule 14(5) of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014, as amended by the 2023 Amendment Rules. Before January 2023, the applicant filed this application with the Registrar of Companies. The 2023 amendment transferred this jurisdiction to the Regional Director. 

5. 30-Day Window After Conviction

A disqualification order based on a criminal conviction does not take effect for 30 days from the date of the order. The director must use this window to file an appeal. If a director files an appeal, the law allows the director to continue serving for seven days after the appellate authority dismisses the appeal.

The best remedy, however, is prevention; timely filing of annual returns and financial statements eliminates the risk of disqualification under Section 164(2) entirely.

Qualification and Disqualification of Directors under Companies Act, 2013: Key Differences 

Qualifications set the conditions a person must satisfy to become a director. Disqualification sets the conditions that make a person ineligible for appointment or continuation in office.

Basis	Qualification	Disqualification
Nature	Positive conditions that must be satisfied	Negative conditions that must not apply
Governing provision	Sections 149, 152, 154, 165, and Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014	Section 164, Companies Act, 2013
When it applies	At the time of appointment and throughout tenure	At the time of appointment and during tenure
Triggered by	The director must fulfil the conditions personally	Personal misconduct by the director or defaults by the company
Effect of non-compliance	A person cannot be appointed as a director	The person must vacate the office, and DIN is deactivated
Duration	Ongoing, must be maintained throughout tenure	5 years from the date of disqualification; permanent for a 7-year conviction
Remedy	Not applicable	NCLT, writ petition to the High Court, or Form DIR-10 after 5 years

Note: The Companies Act, 2013, does not prescribe any educational or professional qualification for directors. What matters is statutory compliance, DIN, DSC, written consent, and absence of disqualification under Section 164. The law focuses far more on who cannot be a director than on who can.

Need help with a director appointment or compliance? RegisterKaro offers end-to-end company registration and corporate compliance services across India. Contact us today for a director appointment, DIN registration, and disqualification removal assistance! 

---