Affidavit testimony, document discovery and production, summoning and compelling attendance, issuing commissions to gather evidence and allocate costs, and more are among the areas in which the Act grants the controller the power to act in accordance with the Civil Procedure Code 1908.

Under the numerous procedures that are available to them, such as applications, oppositions, revocations, revisions to applications, specifications, and many more obligations, the controller can proceed with the implementation of natural justice norms. To be heard by the patent controller general, a person or document may need to attend in person.

Who Is Eligible for Patent Litigation?

Question

Affidavit testimony, document discovery and production, summoning and compelling attendance, issuing commissions to gather evidence and allocate costs, and more are among the areas in which the Act grants the controller the power to act in accordance with the Civil Procedure Code 1908.

Under the numerous procedures that are available to them, such as applications, oppositions, revocations, revisions to applications, specifications, and many more obligations, the controller can proceed with the implementation of natural justice norms. To be heard by the patent controller general, a person or document may need to attend in person.

Who Is Eligible for Patent Litigation?

Accepted Answer

Patentee The patentee has the first right to file an action for infringement if his rights are violated. When a patent is granted to a patentee, it gives him certain rights to use, sell, and manufacture for profit for a predetermined period of time. Any actions taken by someone else without permission that constitute infringement provide the patent holder the right to file a lawsuit. The sole licensee The exclusive licensee is on an equal footing with the patent owners when it comes to filing infringement lawsuits. For any infringement committed after the license’s issuing date, the exclusive licensee may file an infringement claim. Furthermore, the patent owner could be added as a plaintiff instead of a defendant. One may contend that the Act gives the exclusive licensee the authority to bring infringement claims and that the patent holder may be included as a pro forma defendant if he shows no interest in doing so. Licensee According to Section 110 of the Patents Act of 1970, the licensee may also file a case for patent infringement. The licensee must insist that the patentee take action in order to prevent any patent infringement. What happens if the patent holder is asked to do so and does not comply within two months? Therefore, the licensee may bring an infringement case in the patentee’s name as if he were the patent holder, and the patentee may be designated a pro forma defendant. The Centre for WIPO Mediation and Arbitration in order to settle commercial disputes by providing mediation and arbitration services to the parties engaged in intellectual property matters. The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre was established in Geneva, Switzerland, in

Resolving Patent Conflicts: A Deep Dive into Litigation and Arbitration

Ayushi Verma

Related Posts

Understanding Section 194C of the Income Tax Act

Section 17(5) of CGST Act Explained: What is Blocked Credit Under GST?

How to Download a PAN Card?